His job was to kill a saint.
Over the centuries, the Devil’s Advocate became legendary. He was the man who argued for hell’s corner in heaven’s courtroom. His briefs grew into multi-thousand-page volumes. He had the power to delay a canonization for decades, even centuries. And because of him, between 1587 and 1983, when Pope John Paul II dramatically reformed the process, the Church declared fewer than 300 saints—a tiny fraction of those proposed. The Devils Advocate
In a world drowning in easy affirmations, the Devil’s Advocate was the one man paid to doubt. And in that relentless, meticulous, thankless doubt, he protected something precious—the difference between a legend and a life. His job was to kill a saint
Not literally, of course. Prospero’s task was to scrutinize every piece of evidence in the canonization cause of a deceased Franciscan friar from Naples. He would argue against the miracles. He would question the witnesses. He would dig through the candidate’s writings, searching for heresy, pride, or political manipulation. If Prospero found a single legitimate flaw, the cause would collapse. The friar would remain a mere dead man, not a saint. His briefs grew into multi-thousand-page volumes
Prospero Fani died in 1608, obscure and un-sainted. No one argued for his cause. But in the archives of the Vatican, his dusty legal briefs remain a monument to a strange and necessary truth: sometimes, the most faithful thing you can do is say no.
For six months, Prospero read the friar’s letters. He found a phrase in one letter that suggested the friar believed salvation could be earned by suffering alone, bypassing Christ’s grace. He raised the objection. The friar’s supporters argued it was a copyist’s error. Prospero demanded the original manuscript. It took three months to arrive from Naples. The original read differently—the friar had been orthodox after all. Prospero noted the correction without apology. That was his duty.
Then came the miracles. A nun in Florence claimed the friar had appeared to her in a dream and cured her blindness. Prospero cross-examined the nun’s confessor, the attending physician, and three witnesses who had seen her bump into furniture the day before the alleged cure. He discovered the physician had been away on the day in question. The witnesses contradicted each other about the nun’s behavior. Prospero submitted a 40-page brief arguing that the miracle was “not proven beyond natural explanation.”