Medieval Church Law And The Origins Of The Western Legal Tradition A Tribute To Kenneth Pennington -

In the grand narrative of Western legal history, a familiar story once held sway: that the revival of Roman law at Bologna gave birth to a secular legal science, while canon law remained a mere ecclesiastical appendage—a collection of penitential rules and papal decrees. Kenneth Pennington has spent a brilliant career dismantling that fiction. Through his meticulous study of medieval church law, he has revealed not a peripheral system, but the very crucible in which the Western legal tradition was forged.

This tribute honors Pennington’s central thesis: that the ius commune —the common law of Europe—was not Roman alone, but a dynamic fusion of Roman jurisprudence and canonistic equity. In Pennington’s hands, the medieval canonists (Gratian, Huguccio, Innocent IV, and a host of lesser-known masters) emerge as the true architects of concepts we now take for granted: due process, the presumption of innocence, the right against self-incrimination, and the limits of sovereign power. Long before Magna Carta became a secular icon, canon lawyers were arguing that a pope—let alone a king—could be bound by law.

A Tribute to Kenneth Pennington

Yet Pennington has never been a triumphalist of institutional power. With characteristic nuance, he has traced the tensions within the tradition: the clash between papal monarchy and conciliarism, the manipulation of "fullness of power" ( plenitudo potestatis ), and the tragic irony that the same legal machinery designed for justice could be turned toward inquisition and coercion. His biography of Pope Innocent III and his editions of legal commentaries are acts of archaeological care—unearthing not a golden age, but a living, contested, evolving conversation.