But then the business model collapsed. Newspapers fired their veteran critics to save money. The documentary shows a montage of empty desks. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The Rocky Mountain News. The voices that had spent 30 years learning the history of cinema were replaced by generic wire service roundups or algorithmically generated "what to watch" lists.
Because the next time you type "This movie slaps" or "This movie sucks," remember: You are participating in a century-old argument. And thanks to the rebels in this documentary, that argument is a sacred one. for the love of movies the story of american film criticism
Suddenly, the amateur critic wasn't a voice of liberation. They were just... cheap labor for SEO. You might be thinking, "I don't need a critic to tell me if a movie is good. I have a 92% on the Tomatometer." But then the business model collapsed
Without critics like Kael and Sarris, we wouldn't have the vocabulary to argue about "cinematography" or "pacing" or "subtext." Without Ebert, we wouldn't have the empathy to sit through a slow foreign film. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
We live in the age of the “amateur critic.” Scroll through Twitter, Letterboxd, or TikTok for five minutes, and you’ll find a thousand hot takes. We all have a star-rating system built into our thumbs.
The documentary ends on a bittersweet note. The old guard is gone (or dying out). The new guard is yelling into the algorithmic void. But the love remains. For the Love of Movies is not a slick Hollywood production. It’s a scrappy, passionate, slightly academic love letter. If you are the kind of person who stays for the credits, who watches the director’s commentary, or who has ever defended a Star Wars prequel at a party—you owe it to yourself to watch this.
What do you think? Do we need professional critics in the age of TikTok reviews? Or is the "average fan" the only voice that matters now? Drop a comment below.